| Authors |
Dorogova Inna Vladimirovna, Candidate of medical sciences, associate professor, sub-department of therapeutics, general practice, endocrinology and gastroenterology, Penza Institute of Advanced Medical Studies (8A Stasova street, Penza, Russia), i.dorogova@mail.ru
Usanov Viktor Dmitrievich, Candidate of medical sciences, associate professor, head of sub-department of obstetrics and gynecology, Medical Institute, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), victor.usanov@gmail.com
Bocharnikov Denis Yur'evich, Senior lecturer, sub-department of obstetrics and gynecology, Medical Institute, Penza State University (40 Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), roddom@sura.ru
Taktaeva Elena L'vovna, Obstetrician-gynecologist, City Maternity Hospital (122 Pobedy avenue, Penza, Russia), roddom@sura.ru
|
| Abstract |
Background. Currently the influence of nocturnal hypertension on cardiovascu-lar diseases and mortality in general population is well studied. But the number of such examinations of pregnant women is limited. The objective of the work is to ex-amine the influence of the cicardian blood pressure profile of pregnant women on pregnancy, birth and foetus growth.
Materials and methods. 201 pregnant women with normal blood pressure and 303 pregnant women with arterial hypertension were examined. Daily blood pres-sure monitoring was performed using the BPLab Vasotens system (product of LLC «Petr Telegin», Russia).
Results. The circadian profile called "dipper" was more prevalent in the group of pregnant women with normal blood pressure, and the "non-dipper" profile in the group of pregnant women with arterial hypertension. Complications were revealed in 100% of cases in the group of "night-piker", in the group of "non-dipper" - 91,7% of cases, less complications were revealed in the group "dipper" - 88,0% of cases.
Conclusions. The most adverse circadian profile is "night-piker". Fetoplacental failure, premature birth and complications of the foetus are more common for this kind of profiles.
|
| References |
1. Boggia J., Li Y., Thijs L. et al. Lancet. 2007, no. 370, pp. 1219–1229.
2. Brotman D. J., Davidson M. B., Boumitri M., Vidt D. G. Am. J. Hypertens. 2008, no. 21, pp. 92–97.
3. Hermida R. C., Smolensky M. H., Ayala D. E. et al. Chronobiol Int. 2013, no. 30 (3), pp. 355–410.
4. Fan H. Q., Li Y., Thijs L. et al. Hypertens. 2010, no. 28, pp. 2036–2045.
5. Minutolo R., Agarwal R., Borrelli S. et al. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011, no. 171, pp. 1090–1098.
6. Israel S., Israel A., Ben-Dov I. Z., Bursztyn M. Am. J. Hypertens. 2011, no. 24, pp. 796–801.
7. Metoki H., Ohkubo T., Kikuya M. et al. Hypertension. 2006, no. 47, pp. 149–154.
8. Gur'eva V. M. Arterial'naya gipertenziya u beremennykh (klinika, diagnostika, lech-enie): avtoref. diss. d-ra med. nauk: 14.00.01 [Arterial hypertension in pregnancy (hos-pitalization, diagnostics, therapy): author’s abstract of dissertation to apply for the de-gree of the doctor of medical sciences]. Moscow, 2008, 47 p.
9. Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, no. 58, pp. 1165–1173.
10. Dorogova I. V., Panina E. S. Vascular Health and Risk Management. 2015, no. 11, pp. 245–249.
|
